Sains Malaysiana 46(8)(2017): 1299–1307
http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2017-4608-16
Penyerapan Akar Gigi Apeks Luaran
Hasil Rawatan Ortodontik Pada Enam dan 12 Bulan
(External Apical Root Resorption as a Result of Orthodontic
Treatment at Six and 12 Months)
SHAHRUL HISHAM ZAINAL ARIFFIN1, RUS DINA RUS DIN4, ZULHAM YAMAMOTO1,3, IKMAL MOHAMAD JAAFAR2, SAHIDAN SENAFI1 & ROHAYA MEGAT ABDUL WAHAB2*
1Pusat Pengajian Biosains dan Bioteknologi, Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi,
Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
2Jabatan Orthodontik, Fakulti Pergigian, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja
Muda Abdul Aziz, 50300 Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory, Malaysia
3Department of
Histology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera
Utara, Medan, Indonesia
4Program Sains Forensik, Pusat Pengajian Sains Diagnostik dan Kesihatan Gunaan, Fakulti Sains Kesihatan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja
Muda Abdul Aziz, 50300 Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory, Malaysia
Received: 15 August 2016/Accepted:
8 February 2017
ABSTRAK
Penyerapan
akar gigi apeks luaran (PAAL) adalah salah satu kesan negatif
semasa rawatan ortodontik selain daripada gigi yang mengalami
trauma. Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk melihat hubungan antara
sejarah trauma dan kejadian PAAL serta membandingkan tahap keterukan
PAAL antara gigi trauma dan tanpa trauma selepas enam dan 12 bulan
rawatan ortodontik. Sampel kajian merupakan gigi insisor tengah
maksila daripada 23 subjek (8 lelaki dan 15 wanita berumur 12
hingga 26 tahun) dengan 19 mempunyai trauma (tanpa penyerapan
akar gigi) dan 27 tanpa trauma. Rawatan ortodontik dilakukan dengan
menggunakan dawai arkus NiTi 0.014”, 0.018” dan 0.018”
× 0.025” pada enam bulan pertama. Selepas enam bulan,
rawatan ortodontik diteruskan dengan menggunakan dawai arkus keluli
tahan karat saiz 0.019” × 0.025” sehingga rawatan
ortodontik mencapai satu tahun. PAAL gigi diukur melalui imej
tomografi berkomputer pancaran-kon (CBCT) yang diambil sebelum
(X0), selepas enam bulan (X6) dan selepas 12 bulan (X12) rawatan
ortodontik. Penyerapan akar dikira dengan menolak panjang gigi
pada X6 dan X12 dengan panjang gigi pada X0. Kejadian PAAL dalam
kumpulan trauma dan tanpa trauma masing-masing adalah 89.5% dan
77.8% (penyerapan akar rendah dari 2 mm) selepas enam bulan rawatan
ortodontik. Selepas 12 bulan rawatan ortodontik, semua gigi menunjukkan
PAAL. Kejadian PAAL antara gigi trauma dan tanpa trauma tidak
menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan (p>0.05). Dalam kajian
ini, gigi yang mengalami trauma serta tanpa trauma membentuk PAAL
pada kadar yang sama selepas enam dan 12 bulan rawatan orthodontik.
Oleh itu, adalah selamat untuk melakukan rawatan ortodontik kepada
pesakit yang mempunyai sejarah trauma pada gigi.
Kata kunci: Insisor; ortodontik; penyerapan akar gigi; trauma pergigian
ABSTRACT
External apical root
resorption (EARR) is one of the negative effects of orthodontic treatment
apart from dental trauma. The objectives
of this study were to observed the
relationship between history of trauma and the occurence
of EARR
and also to compare the severity of EARR between
traumatized and nontraumatized teeth
during six and 12 months of orthodontic treatment. The sample
of study was maxilla central incisor from 23 subjects (8 male
and 15 female age 12 to 26 years old) in which 19 with traumatized
teeth (without root resorption) and 27 nontraumatized
teeth. Orthodontic treatment used 0.014”,
0.018” and 0.018” × 0.025”
NiTi archwires for the first
six months. After six months, orthodontic treatment was continued
using 0.019"× 0.025" stainless steel arch wire
until the treatment reached one year. EARR
was measured using cone beam computed tomography
(CBCT)
images that was taken before (X0), after six months (X6)
and after 12 months (X12) of orthodontic treatment. Root resorption
was calculated by substracting tooth
length at X6 and X12 with tooth length at X0.
The incidence of EARR in traumatised
and non-traumatised teeth group were
each 89.5% and 77.8%, respectively (root resorption less than
2 mm) after six months of orthodontic treatment. After 12 months
of orthodontic treatment, all teeth showed EARR. There is no significant difference in the occurence of EARR between traumatized and nontraumatized teeth (p>0.05). In this study, traumatized
and nontraumatized teeth develop EARR at
the same rate after six and 12 months of orthodontic treatment.
Hence, it is safe to do an orthodontic treatment to patients with
dental trauma history.
Keywords: Dental trauma; incisor; orthodontic; root resorption
REFERENCES
Abass, S.K. & Hartsfield, J.K. 2007. Orthodontics and external apical root resorption. Seminars
in Orthodontics 13: 246-256.
Al-Qawasmi, R.A., Hartsfield, J.K.,
Everett, E.T., Flury, L., Liu, L., Foroud, T.M., Macri, J.V. &
Roberts, W.E. 2003. Genetic
predisposition to external apical root resorption. American Journal
of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopeadics 123(3): 242-252.
Alqerban, A., Jacobs, R., Fieuws, S. &
Willems, G. 2011. Comparison of two cone beam
computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of
impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. European
Journal of Orthodontics 33(1): 93-102.
Artun, J., Smale, I., Behbehani,
F., Doppel, D., Van’t Hof,
M. & Kuijpers-Jagtman, A.M. 2005. Apical root resorption six and 12 months after
initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Angle Orthodontist 75(6): 919-926.
Beck, B.W. & Harris, E.F. 1994. Apical root resorption in orthodontically treated
subjects: Analysis of edgewise and light wire mechanics. American Journal of
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopeadics 105(4): 350-361.
Brezniak, N., Goren, S., Zoizner, R., Dinbar, A., Arad,
A., Wasserstein, A. & Heller, M. 2004. A comparison of three methods to
accurately measure root length. Angle Orthodontist 74(6): 786-791.
Brin, I., Tulloch, J.F.C., Koroluk, L. &
Philips, C. 2003. External apical root
resorption in Class II malocclusion: A retrospective review of 1- versus
2-phase treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopeadics124(2): 151-156.
Castro, I., Valladares-Neto, J. &
Estrela, C. 2015. Contribution of cone beam
computed tomography to the detection of apical root resorption after
orthodontic treatment in root-filled and vital teeth. Angle Orthodontist 85(5):
771-776.
Castro, I.O., Alencar, A.H.G., Valladares-Neto, J. & Estrela, C. 2013. Apical root resorption due to orthodontic treatment detected by
cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthodontist 83: 196-203.
Consolaro, A. & Furquim, L.Z. 2014. Extreme root resorption associated with induced tooth movement: A
protocol for clinical management. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 19:
19-26.
Da Silveira, H.L.D., Silveira,
H.E.D., Liedke, G.S., Lermen,
C.A., Dos Santos, R.B. & De Figueiredo,
J.A.P. 2007. Diagnostic ability of computed
tomography to evaluate external root resorption in vitro.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
36(7): 393-396.
Dudic, A., Giannopoulou, C., Leuzinger, M. & Kiliaridis,
S. 2009. Detection of apical root resorption
after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam
computed tomography of super-high resolution. American Journal of
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics 135: 434-437.
Erdinç, A.M.E. & Dinçer, B. 2004. Perception of pain during orthodontic treatment with fixed
appliances. European Journal of Orthodontics 26(1): 79-85.
Ericson, S. & Kurol, J. 2000. Resorption of incisors after ectopic eruption of maxillary
canines: A CT study. Angle Orthodontist 70(6): 415-423.
Esteves, T., Ramos, A.L., Pereira, C.M. & Hidalgo, M.M. 2007. Orthodontic root resorption of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of
Endodontics 33: 119-122.
Fox, N. 2005. Longer orthodontic
treatment may result in greater external apical root resorption. Journal of
Evidence-Based Dental Practice 6(1): 21.
Galvão, M.C.d.S., Sato, J.R. & Coelho,
E.C. 2012. Dahlberg formula: A novel approach for
its evaluation. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 17: 115-124.
Han, G., Huang, S., Hoff, J.W.V., Zeng, X. & Kuijpers-Jagtmand, A.M. 2005. Root resorption after orthodontic intrusion and extrusion: An intraindividual study. Angle Orthodontist 75:
912-918.
Kaley, J. & Phillips, C. 1991. Factors related to root resorption in edgewise practice. Angle Orthodontist 61:
125-132.
Karkhanechi, M., Chow, D., Sipkin, J., Sherman, D.,
Boylan, R.J., Norman, R.G., Craig, R.G. & Cisneros, G.J. 2013. Periodontal status of adult patients treated with fixed buccal
appliances and removable aligners over one year of active orthodontic therapy. Angle
Orthodontist 83(1): 146-151.
Kasiulevičius, V., Sapoka, V. & Filipaviciute, R. 2006. Sample size calculation in epidemiological studies. Gerontologija 7(4): 225-231.
Leach, H.A., Ireland, A.J. & Whaites,
E.J. 2001. Radiographic diagnosis of root resorption in
relation to orthodontics. British Dental Journal 190: 16-22.
Levander, E. & Malmgren, O. 1988. Evaluation of the risk of root resorption during orthodontic
treatment: A study of upper incisors. European Journal of Orthodontics 10(1):
30-38.
Li, G. 2013. Patient radiation dose and protection from cone-beam
computed tomography. Imaging Science in Dentistry 43(2):
63-69.
Liedke, G.S., da Silveira, H.E.D., da Silveira,
H.L.D., Dutra, V. & de Figueiredo, J.A.P. 2009.
Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to
evaluate simulated external root resorption. Journal of Endodontics 35(2):
233-235.
Linge, B.O. & Linge, L. 1983. Apical root resorption in upper anterior teeth. The European Journal of Orthodontics 5: 173-183.
Linge, L. & Linge, B.O. 1991. Patient characteristics and treatment variables associated with
apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. American Journal of
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopeadics 99(1): 35-43.
Long, H., Zhou, Y., Pyakurel, U., Liao,
L., Jian, F., Xue, J., Ye, N., Yang, X., Wang, Y.
& Lai, W. 2013. Comparison of adverse
effects between lingual and labial orthodontic treatment: A systematic review. Angle
Orthodontist 83(6): 1066-1073.
Lopatiene, K. & Dumbravaite, A. 2008. Risk factors of root resorption after
orthodontic treatment. Stomatologija,
Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal 10: 89-95.
Lund, H., Gröndahl, K. & Gröndahl, H-G. 2010. Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal
bone level during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthodontist 80(3):
466-473.
Lupi, J.E., Handelman, C.S. & Sadowsky, C. 1996. Prevalence and severity of apical root resorption and alveolar bone loss in orthodontically treated adults. American Journal of Orthodontics
and Dentofacial Orthopaedics 109: 28-37.
Luther, F., Dominguez-Gonzalez, S. & Fayle,
S.A. 2005. Teamwork in orthodontics: Limiting the
risks of root resorption. British Dental Journal 198: 407-411.
Malmgren, O., Goldson, L., Hill, C., Orwin, A., Petrini, L. & Lundberg, M. 1982. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment of traumatized teeth. American Journal of Orthodontics 82(6): 487-491.
Maltha, J.C., Leeuwen, E.J.v., Dijkman, G.E.H.M. &
Kuijpers- Jagtman, A.M. 2004. Incidence and severity of root resorption in orthodontically
moved premolars in dogs. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
7: 115-121.
Mandall, N., Lowe, C., Worthington,
H., Sandler, J., Derwent, S., Abdi-Oskouei, M. &
Ward, S. 2006. Which orthodontic archwire sequence? A randomized clinical trial. European Journal of
Orthodontics 28: 561-566.
Martins, D.R., Tibola, D., Janson, G.
& Maria, F.R.T. 2012. Effects of intrusion
combined with anterior retraction on apical root resorption. European
Journal of Orthodontics 34: 170-175.
Maués, C.P.R., Nascimento, R.R.D. & Vilella, O.D.V. 2015. Severe root resorption resulting from orthodontic treatment: Prevalence and
risk factors. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 20: 52-58.
Nanekrungsan, K., Patanaporn,
V., Janhom, A. & Korwanich,
N. 2012. External apical root resorption in maxillary incisors in orthodontic
patients: Associated factors and radiographic evaluation. Imaging
Science in Dentistry 42(3): 147-154.
Oliveira, A.G.D., Consolaro, A., Junqueira, J.L.C., Martins-Ortiz, M.F. & Franzolin, S.D.O.B. 2011. Analysis of predictors of root resorption in orthodontic treatment. Journal of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene 3: 46-52.
Owman-Moll, P. 1995. Orthodontic
tooth movement and root resorption with special reference to force magnitude
and duration. A clinical and histological investigation in
adolescents. Swedish Dental Journal 105(Supplement): 1-45.
Patel, S., Dawood, A., Mannocci, F.,
Wilson, R. & Ford, T.P. 2009. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed
tomography and intraoral radiography. International Endodontic Journal 42:
507-515.
Pauwels, R., Beinsberger,
J., Collaert, B., Theodorakou,
C., Rogers, J., Walker, A., Cockmartin, L., Bosmans, H., Jacobs, R., Bogaerts,
R. & Horner, K. 2012. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed
tomography scanners. European Journal of Radiology 81(2): 267-271.
Sameshima,
G.T. & Sinclair, P.M. 2001. Predicting and preventing root
resorption: Part I. Diagnostic factors. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopeadics119(5):
505-510.
Sanders,
M.A., Hoyjberg, C., Chu, C.B., Leggitt,
V.L. & Kim, J.S. 2007. Common orthodontic appliances cause artifacts that
degrade the diagnostic quality of CBCT images. Journal of the California
Dental Association 35(12): 850-857.
Sherrard,
J.F., Rossouw, P.E., Benson, B.W., Carrillo, R. & Buschang, P.H. 2010. Accuracy and reliability of
tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopeadics137: 100-108.
Smale,
I., Årtun, J., Behbehani,
F., Doppel, D., Hof, M.V.T. & Kuijpers-Jagtman,
A.M. 2005. Apical root resorption 6 months after initiation of fixed
orthodontic appliance therapy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics128:
57-67.
Talic,
N.F. 2011. Adverse effects of orthodontic treatment: A clinical perspective. The Saudi
Dental Journal 23: 55-59.
Tecco,
S., D’Attilio, M., Tetè, S.
& Festa, F. 2009. Prevalence and
type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics 31(4): 380-384.
Thomson,
W.M. 2002. Orthodontic treatment outcomes in the long term: Findings from a longitudinal
study of New Zealanders. Angle Orthodontist 72: 449-455.
Thongudomporn, U.
& Freer, T.J. 1998. Anomalous dental morphology and root resorption during orthodontic treatment: A
pilot study. Australian Orthodontic Journal 15(3): 162-167.
Topkara,
A., Karaman, A.I. & Kau,
C.H. 2012. Apical root resorption caused by orthodontic forces: A brief review and a
long-term observation. European Journal of Dentistry 6: 445-453.
Tsiklakis,
K., Donta, C., Gavala, S., Karayianni,
K., Kamenopoulou, V. & Hourdakis,
C.J. 2005. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose cone beam CT. European
Journal of Radiology 56(3): 413-417.
Tsuchiya,
S., Tsuchiya, M., Nishioka, T., Suzuki, O., Sasano, Y. & Igarashi, K. 2013. Physiological distal
drift in rat molars contributes to acellular cementum formation. The Anatomical
Record 296: 1255-1263.
Weiland, F. 2003.
Constant versus dissipating forces in orthodontics: The effect on initial tooth
movement and root resorption. European Journal of Orthodontics 25(4):
335-342.
Weltman,
B., Vig, K.W., Fields, H.W., Shanker,
S. & Kaizar, E.E. 2010. Root resorption
associated with orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review. American
Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 137(4):
462-476.
Yu,
J-H., Shu, K-W., Tsai, M-T., Hsu, J-T., Chang, H-W. & Tung, K-L.
2012. A cone-beam computed tomography study of orthodontic apical root
resorption. Journal of Dental Sciences 8(1): 74-79.
*Corresponding
author; email: shahroy7@gmail.com