Sains Malaysiana 48(3)(2019): 581–588
            
          
              http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2019-4803-10 
                 
          
             
          
          Different Imazethapyr Placements and Rainfall Amounts Affect
            Phytotoxic Activity of Imazethapyr in Combination with Oil Palm Frond Residue
            Mulches against Common Weeds in Landscapes
            
          
              (Penempatan Imazetapir dan Kuantiti Hujan Mempengaruhi Aktiviti Kefitotoksikan 
                Gabungan Imazetapir dengan Sungkupan Pelepah Kelapa Sawit terhadap 
                Kawalan Rumpai dalam Landskap)  
          
             
          
          MUHAMMAD AMIRUL NORDIN1, DILIPKUMAR MASILAMANY2 & CHUAH TSE SENG3*
            
          
          
             
          
          1School
            of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala
            Terengganu, Terengganu Darul Iman, Malaysia
            
          
          
             
          
          2Inbred
            Rice Program, Rice Research Center Malaysian Agricultural Research and
            Development Institute, (MARDI) 13200 Seberang Perai, Kepala Batas, Pulau
            Pinang, Malaysia
            
          
          
             
          
          3Faculty
            of Plantation and Agrotechnology, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 02600 Arau,
            Perlis, Malaysia
            
          
          
             
          
          Diserahkan: 3 Mei 2018/Diterima: 15 Disember 2018
            
          
          
             
          
          ABSTRACT
            
          
          A combination of oil palm frond (OPF)
            mulch and imazathapyr has been shown to provide great inhibition of weed but
            its phytotoxicity may be influenced by imazethapyr placement on the OPF mulch
            and rainfall amount. This study aimed to evaluate effects of herbicide
            placement and rainfall amount on the phytotoxic activity of imazethapyr in
            combination with OPF mulches against goosegrass,
            slender cyperus and coat buttons under glasshouse conditions. Imazethapyr was
            applied at 10.4 g a.i. ha-1 to
            under or above or as a pretreatment on the OPF mulch
            residue powder (< 2 mm) at 3.5 t ha-1.
            Imazethapyr placement did not influence its inhibitory effects against weed
            emergence. Both pretreated mulches and imazethapyr applied under the mulches
            had comparable inhibition of seedling growth for goosegrass and slender cyperus.
            However, the pretreated mulches gave better seedling growth inhibition of both
            bioassay species as compared to those of imazethapyr that applied above
            mulches. Coat button was highly inhibited regardless of any imazethapyr
            placements. An increase in rainfall amount from 150 to 450 mm could increase
            the seedling emergence of goosegrass and slender cyperus from 30 to 80% when
            subjected to pretreated mulches. However, different rainfall amounts had no
            significant effect on coat buttons seedling emergence. The pretreated mulches
            could reduce weed seedling growth by 75 to 80% without being affected by the
            rainfall amounts. The present results suggested that phytotoxic activity of
            imazethapyr in combination with OPF residue mulches is
            dependent on imazethapyr placement, rainfall amount and weed species.
  
          
          
             
          
          Keywords: Herbicide placement; imazethapyr; oil palm frond mulch;
            rainfall amount
            
          
          
             
          
          ABSTRAK
            
          
          Kombinasi antara sungkupan pelepah kelapa sawit (PKS)
            dan imazetapir telah menunjukkan perencatan rumpai yang baik tetapi
            kefitotoksikannya mungkin dipengaruhi oleh penempatan imazetapir pada PKS dan
            kuantiti hujan. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menilai kesan penempatan racun
            rumpai dan kuantiti hujan terhadap aktivit kefitotoksikan kombinasi imazetapir
            dengan sungkupan PKS terhadap rumput sambau, rumput
            wangi dan kancing baju di bawah keadaan rumah kaca. Imazetapir pada 10.4 g a.i.
            ha-1 ditempatkan sama ada di bawah
            atau di atas atau sebagai pra-rawatan pada serbuk sungkupan PKS (<
            2 mm) pada 3.5 t ha-1. Penempatan imazetapir tidak
            mempengaruhi keberkesanannya terhadap perencatan kemunculan rumpai. Pra-rawatan
            sungkupan dan imazetapir yang disembur di bawah sungkupan mempunyai perencatan
            yang setanding terhadap pertumbuhan anak benih rumput sambau dan rumput wangi.
            Walau bagaimanapun, pra-rawatan sungkupan memberi perencatan yang lebik baik
            terhadap pertumbuhan kedua-dua spesies bioasai berbanding dengan yang disembur
            di atas sungkupan. Kancing baju mempunyai perencatan yang tinggi tanpa mengira
            sebarang penempatan imazetapir. Peningkatan kuantiti hujan daripada 150 hingga
            450 mm dapat meningkatkan kemunculan anak benih rumput sambau dan rumput wangi
            daripada 30 hingga 80% apabila diperlakukan dengan pra-rawatan sungkupan. Walau
            bagaimanapun, kuantiti hujan yang berbeza tidak memberi kesan yang bererti pada
            kemunculan anak benih kancing baju. Pra-rawatan sungkupan dapat mengurangkan
            pertumbuhan benih rumpai sebanyak 75 hingga 80% tanpa dipengaruhi oleh kuantiti
            hujan. Keputusan kajian ini mencadangkan bahawa aktiviti kefitotoksikan
            imazetapir yang dicampur bersama sungkupan PKS adalah
            bergantung kepada penempatan imazetapir, kuantiti hujan dan spesies rumpai.
  
          
          
             
          
          Kata kunci: Imazetapir; kuantiti hujan;
            penempatan racun rumpai; sungkupan pelepah kelapa sawit
            
          
          RUJUKAN
            
          
          Aichele, T.M. & Penner, D. 2005. Adsorption, desorption,
            and degradation of imidazolinones in Soil 1. Weed Technology 19:
            154-159.
  
          
          Ainie, K., Ai, T.W., Kamaruddin, N. & Beng, Y.C. 2007.
            Pesticide application in the oil palm plantation. Oil Palm Bulletin 54:
            52-67.
  
          
          Anderson, A.L. 2006. The influence of tillage and landscape
            on imazethapyr persistence and sorption in soil. MSc dissertation. Manitoba:
            University of Manitoba (Unpublished).
            
          
          Broschat, T.K. 2007. Effects of mulch type and fertilizer
            placement on weed growth and soil pH and nutrient content. HortTechnology 17:
            174-177.
  
          
          Case, L.T. & Mathers, H. 2006. Herbicide treated mulches
            for weed control in ornamentals. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 24:
            84-90.
  
          
          Chalker-Scott, L. 2007. Impact of mulches on landscape
            plants and the environment-A review. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 25:
            239-249.
  
          
          Chen, Y., Strahan, R.E. & Bracy, R.P. 2013. Effects of
            mulching and preemergence herbicide placement on yellow nutsedge control and
            ornamental plant quality in landscape beds. HortTechnology 23(5):
            651-658.
  
          
          Chuah, T.S. & Lim, W.K. 2015. Assessment of phytotoxic
            potential of oil palm leaflet, rachis and frond extracts and powders on
            goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L.) Geertn.) germination, emergence and
            seedling growth. Malaysian Applied Biology 44(2): 75-84.
  
          
          Curran, W.S., Loux, M.M., Liebl, R.A. & Simmons, F.W.
            1992. Photolysis of imidazolinone herbicides in aqueous solution and on soil. Weed
              Science 40: 143-148.
  
          
          Dilipkumar, M., Mazira, C.M. & Chuah, T.S. 2017. The
            potential use of oil palm frond mulch treated with imazethapyr for weed control
            in Malaysian coconut plantation. Sains Malaysiana 46(8): 1171-1181.
  
          
          Faiz, M.A.A. 1999. Effects of herbicides on seed germination
            and control of Pennisetum polystachion (l.) schult. Journal of
              Rubber Research 2(2): 120-130.
  
          
          Gillespie, W.E., Czapar, G.F. & Hager, A.G. 2011.
            Pesticide fate in the environment: A guide for field inspectors. Contract
              Report. p. 10.
  
          
          Jursík, M., Kočárek, M., Hamouzová, K., Soukup, J.
  & Venclová, V. 2013. Effect of precipitation on the dissipation, efficacy
            and selectivity of three chloroacetamide herbicides in sunflower. Plant Soil
              Environment 59(4): 175-182.
  
          
          Khalid, H., Zin, Z.Z. & Anderson, J.M. 1999. Effect of
            oil palm residues management at replanting on soil nutrient dynamics and oil
            palm growth. Proceeding of the PORIM International Palm Oil Congress.
            Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Malaysian Palm Oil Board. pp. 235-246.
  
          
          Lanphear, F.O. 1968. Incorporation of Dichlobenil in
            mulches. Weeds 16: 230-231.
  
          
          Marble, S.C. 2015. Herbicide and mulch interactions: A
            review of the literature and implications for the landscape maintenance
            industry. Weed Technology 29: 341-349.
  
          
          Martini, G., Pedrinho Junior, A.F.F. & Durigan, J.C.
            2003. Eficácia do herbicida glifosato-potássico submetido à chuva simulada após
            a aplicação. Bragantia 62(1): 39-45.
  
          
          Mathers, H. 2003. Novel methods of weed control in
            containers. HortTechnology 13: 28-31.
  
          
          Monquero, P.A. & Silva, A.C. 2007. Efeito do período de
            chuva no controle de Euphorbia heterophylla e Ipomoea purpurea pelos herbicidas
            glyphosate e sulfosate. Planta Daninha 25(2): 399-404.
  
          
          Samtani, J.B., Kling, G.J., Mathers, H. & Case, L. 2007.
            Rice hulls, leaf-waste pellets, and pine bark as herbicide carriers for
            container-grown woody ornamentals. HortTechnology 17: 289-295.
  
          
          Smith, H.C., Ferrell, J.A., Webster, T.M., Fernandez, J.V.,
            Dittmar, P.J., Munoz, P.R. & MacDonald, G.E. 2016. Impact of irrigation
            volume on PRE herbicide activity. Weed Technology 30(3): 793-800.
  
          
          Somireddy,
            U.R. 2012. Effect of herbicide-organic mulch combinations on weed control and
            herbicide persistence. PhD dissertation. United States: Ohio State University
            (Unpublished).
            
          
          Sondhia,
            S. 2013. Evaluation of imazethapyr leaching in soil under natural rainfall
            conditions. Indian Journal of Weed Science 45(1): 58-61.
  
          
          Thomas,
            A.F. 1973. Herbicide-impregnated mulches for weed control in container nursery
            stock. Scientia Horticulturae 1(2): 165-170.
  
          
          Thomson,
            W.T. 1993. Agricultural chemicals. Book II Herbicides. Fresno, CA:
            Thomson Publications.
  
          
          Vencill,
            W.K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Champaign: Weed Science Society
            of America. p. 154.
  
          
          
             
          
          *Pengarang
            untuk surat-menyurat; email: chuahts@perlis.uitm.edu.my