The Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences, Vol 13 No 1 (2009): 94 - 99
Hydrophobicity Characteristics of Natural
Organic Matter and the Formation of THM
Lim Fang Yee1, Md. Pauzi Abdullah1*, Abass Abdullah2, Basar Ishak2,
Khairul Nidzham Zainal Abidin2
1Centre for Water Research and Analysis, Faculty of Science and Technology,
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan.
2Semenyih River Water Treatment Plant, P.O. Box 27, 43807 Dengkil.
*Corresponding author: mpauzi@ukm.my
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between the characteristics of natural organic matter (NOM) and the formation of trihalomethanes (THMs). NOM from Semenyih river was isolated using resin adsorption method into six fractions based on hydrophobicity and acidity. Hydrophobic acid (40 %) and hydrophilic neutral (22 %) were the major component in the water sample. All the six classes of NOM were evaluated for their trihalomethane formation potential (THMFP) and related parameters. The result shows that the major fractions (hydrophobic acid and hydrophilic neutral) were not the reactive organic fractions in the formation of THMs. Hydrophobic base and hydrophilic base were found to be the most reactive fractions of concern with respect to the formation of THMs. Hydrophobic contents in NOM favoured the formation of THMs. In addition, increasing pH from 6 to 9 increased THM formation. The results from the present study indicated that the identification and specific removal of NOM fractions in raw water would minimize the formation of THMs during chlorination process.
Keywords: Natural organic matter, trihalomethanes, chlorination
References
1. Kranser, S.W., Weinberg, H.S., Richardson, S.D., Pastor, S.J., Chinn, R., Sclimenti, M.J., Onstad, G.D. & Thruston, A.D. 2006. Occurence of new generation of disinfection byproducts. Environmetal Science and Technology 40(23): 7175-7185.
2. Sirivedhin, T. & Gray, K.A. 2005. 2. Comparison of the disinfection by-product formation potentials between a wastewater effluent and surface waters. Water Research 39: 1025-1036.
3. Zhou, J.L. & Banks, C.J. 1990. Fractionation of humic acid components by ion exchange chromatography. Environmetal Science and Technology 11: 1147-1152.
4. Malcolm, R.L. & MacCarthy, P. 1992. Quantitative evaluation of XAD-8 and XAD-4 resins used in tandem for removing organic solutes from water. Environment International 18: 597-607.
5. Daniel, M.W., Garland, D.S., Narr, J. & Woolard, C.R. 2003. Natural organic matter and DBP formation potential in Alaskan water supplies. Water Research 37(4): 939-947.
6. Liang, L. & Singer, P.C. 2003. Factors influencing the formation od relative distribution of haloacetic acids and trihalomethanes in drinking water. Environmetal Science and Technology 37: 2920-2928.
7. Amy, G.L., Minear, R.A. & Cooper, W.J. 1987. Developing models for predicting trihalomethane formation potential and kinetics. Journal of American Water Works Association 79(7): 89-97.
8. Reckhow, D.A., Singer, P.C. & Malcolm, R.L. 1990. Chlorination of humic materials: byproducts formation and chemical interptrtations. Environmetal Science and Technology 24(11): 1655-1664.
9. Huang, W. & Yeh, H. 1997. The effect of organic characteristics and bromide on disinfection by-products formation by chlorination. Journal of Environmental Science and Health A32: 2311-2336.
10. Zhang, H., Qu, J., Liu, H. & Wei, D. 2009. Characterization of dissolved organic matter fractions and its relationship with the disinfection by-products formation. Journal of Environmental Sciences 21(1): 54-61.
11. Roccaro, P. & Vagliasindi, F.G.A. 2009. Differential vs. absolute UV absorbance approaches in studying NOM reactivity in DBPs formation: Comparison and applicability. Water Research 43(3): 744-750.
12. Fabris, R., Chow, C.W.K., Drikas, M. & Eikebrokk, B. 2008. Comparison of NOM character in selected Australian and Norwegian drinking waters. Water Research 42(15): 4188-4196.
13. Wong, H., Mok, K.M. & Fan, X.J. 2007. Natural organic matter and formation of trihalomethanes in two water treatment processes. Desalination 210(1-3): 44-51.
14. Lu, J., Zhangm T., Ma, J. & Chen, Z. 2009. Evaluation of disinfection by-products formation during chlorination and chloramination of dissolved natural organic matter fractions isolated from a filtered river water. Journal of Hazardous Materials 162(1): 140-145.
15. Egeberg, P.K. & Alberts, J.J. 2002. Determination of hydrophobicity of NOM by RP-HPLC, and the effect of pH and ionic strength. Water Research 36(20): 4997-5004.
16. Imai, A., Matsushige, K. & Nagai, T. 2003. Trihalomethane formation potential of dissolved organic matter in a shallow eutrophic lake. Water Research 37: 4284-4294.
17. Leenheer, J.A. & Huffman, N.S. 1979. Analytical method for dissolved-organic carbon. Water Resour. Invest. 79(4): 1-16.
18. Reckhow, D.A., Singer, P.C. 1985. Mechanisms of organic halide formation during fulvic acid chlorination and implications with respect to preozonation. In Water Chlorination: Environmental Impact and Health Effect. Vol. 5. Pp1229-1257. Jolley, R.L., Brungs, W.A., Cotruvo, J.A., Cumming, R.B., Mattice, J.S., Jacobs, V.A. Eds. Lewis Publishers: Chelsea, MI.
19. Jung, C.W. & Son, H.J. 2008. The relationship between disinfection by-products formation and characteristics of natural organic matter in raw water. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 25(4): 714-720.