Sains Ma1aysiana 26(2): 53-63 (1997)                                                                                          Pengajian Kuantitatif/

                                                                                                                                                                Quantitative Studies

 

Kesan Pilihanraya terhadap Pasaran Saham

(Influence of elections on the stock market)

 

 

Khairul Anuar Bin Mohd Ali, Zaildi Bin Isa

Program Sains Aktuasi

Fakulti Sains Matematik

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor D.E.

 

Ahmad Mahir Bin Razali

Jabatan Statistik

Fakulti Sains Matematik

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor D.E.

 

 

ABSTRAK

 

Tujuan kajian ini dibuat adalah untuk menguji sama ada wujudnya hubungan antara pilihanraya dengan pasaran saham. Kajian ini juga cuba menentukan bila ia berlaku sama ada sebelum atau selepas pilihanraya dan menentukan tempoh sebenar ia betul-betul berkesan. Kaedah yang digunakan melibatkan penggunaan model siri masa yang dikenali sebagai model "intervention". Model intervention ini merupakan satu model khas siri masa yang melibatkan siri output dan siri input serta cuba melihat korelasi silang antara kedua-dua siri tersebut. Hasil kajian menunjukkan wujudnya hubungan secara bererti antara pilihanraya dengan pasaran saham pada tahun 1990 tetapi hubungan yang tidak bererti bagi pilihanraya pada tahun 1978, 1982 dan 1986 dengan pasaran saham. Penemuan bagi tahun 1990 ini menyokong kajian-kajian lepas yang pernah dilakukan oleh beberapa orang penyelidik lain.

 

ABSTRACT

 

The purpose of this research is to determine the relationship between the elections and the stock market. This research is also aimed to determine whether it occurs before or after the election period and to determine the duration that it is most significant. The methodology that is used involves the application of the time series model which is known as the intervention model. This is a special time series model that involved the input and the output series which tries to observe the cross correlation between these two series. The study has shown that there is a significant relationship between the elections and the stock market in 1990. However, there was no similar significant relationship in the 1978, 1982 and 1986 elections. The finding for the year 1990 supports the studies done by other researchers.

 

 

RUJUKAN/REFERENCES

 

Ap Gwilym, Owain & Buckle, Mike. 1994. The efficiency of stock and options market: Tests based on 1992 UK election opinion polls. Journal of Applied Financial Economics 4: 345-354.

Azizul Shamsuddin. 1994. Impact of Elections On Stocks. Investors Digest BSKL. Oct, p. 12-29.

Balke, S. 1991. Partisanship theory, Macroeconomics outcome, and Endogenous Elections. Southern Economic Journal, April: 920-935.

Box, G.E.P, & Tiao, G.C. 1975. Intervention Analysis with Applications to Econom­ics and Environmental Problems. Journal of American Statistical Association, March 70-9.

Brander, J. A. 1991. Election Polls, Free Trade and The Stock Market: Evidence from the 1988 Canadian General Election. Canadian Journal of Economics, November: 827-843.

Colback, S. 1995. More than a golden future. Resident Abroad, Jun: 16-19.

Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin Inc (HLHZ). 1988. Latest results of control         premium study indicate activity is booming. Corporate Growth, Nov/Dec: 4-60.

Ito, T. 1991. International impacts on domestic political, economy: a case of Japanese general election. Journal of International Money and Finance 10:73-89.

Vong, J. 1986. Will the market take its usual breather? The Star, 5 Oktober.

Laporan Bank Negara Malaysia. 1978. Jun, 1l(l/2).

Laporan Bank Negara Malaysia. 1978. September, 11(3).

Laporan Bank Negara Malaysia. 1982. Mac/Jun, 15(1/2).

Laporan Bank Negara Malaysia. 1982. September, 15(3).

Laporan Bank Negara Malaysia. 1982. Disember, 15(4).

Laporan Bank Negara Malaysia. 1986. Mac/Jun, 1(1).

Laporan Bank Negara Malaysia. 1990. September, 5(2).

Laporan Bank Negara Malaysia. 1990. Disember, 5(3).

Laporan Ekonomi Malaysia. 1978, 1982, 1986 dan 1990.

Laporan Pilihanraya Umum Malaysia 1978. Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya Malaysia.

Laporan Pilihanraya Umum Malaysia 1982. Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya Malaysia.

Laporan Pilihanraya Umum Malaysia 1986. Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya Malaysia.

Laporan Pilihanraya Umum Malaysia 1990. Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya Malaysia.

Manning, D.N. 1988. The effect of political uncertainty on the stock market: The case of British Telecom. Applied Economics, July: 881-889.

Moxon, L. 1991. Smaller company equities looking good. Accountancy (ACE) 108: 36-37. New Straits Times. 1990. 21 October: 24.

Othman Yong. 1991. Making Money in the Stock Market. Petaling Jaya : Pelanduk Publications.

Othman Yong. 1993. How To Go for the Big Money. Kuala Lumpur: Leeds Publica­tion.

Othman Yong. 1995. Antara Kekalutan, Kerawakan dan Kecekapan Pasaran Saham: Mitos, Teori dan Realiti. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.

Price, M. 1989. Election Results Fuel Tokyo Market. Pensions & Investments 17: 37-8.

Price, M. 1994. Mexico boomerangs back into investment portfolios. Pensions & Investment 22: 3-33.

Roubini, N. 1991. Economic and Political determinants of budget deficits in developing countries. Journal of International Money and Finance. 10: 49-72.

Sivy, M. 1996. How You Can Make Money in 1992. Journal of Money: 50-55.

Strong, N. 1992. Modelling abnormal returns: A review article. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 19 (4): 533-52.

The STAR. 18 Oktober. 1990.

 

 

 

previous