Sains
Malaysiana 38(5)(2009): 699–705
Structural Break Unit-root Tests: An
Empirical Study of
Malaysian Equity Markets
(Ujian
Perubahan Struktur Punca Unit: Satu Kajian Empirik di Pasaran Ekuiti Malaysia)
Chin Wen Cheong*
Research Centre of Mathematical
Science
Multimedia University 63100
Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Zaidi Isa
Faculty of Science and Technology,
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
Received: 17 October 2008 / Accepted:
6 March 2009
ABSTRACT
This
research investigated the unit-root tests using nonparametric
sequences-reversals (S-R),
Phillip-Perron (PP) tests and
parametric Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test for the Malaysian equity indices. Under the considerations
of drift and structural break, it was found that during the restructuring
period after the Asian financial crisis, most of the indices provided evidences
against the unit-root tests. These results are somewhat contrasted with the
conventional unit-root tests that ignored the impact of structural changes. In
addition, the S-R tests were found to have little power to identify the
deviations from the unit-root even after the inclusion of structural break.
Keywords:
Random walk hypothesis; sequences-reversals test; structural change
ABSTRAK
Kajian ini menyelidik ujian punca unit dengan menggunakan ujian
rentetan pembalikan (S-R) tak
berparameter, ujian Phillip-Perron (PP) dan ujian Dickey-Fuller (ADF) terimbuh terhadap ekuiti indek Malaysia. Di bawah pertimbangan hanyutan dan perubahan struktur, adalah
didapati semasa tempoh penstrukturan selepas krisis kewangan Asia, majoriti
indeks didapati bercanggah terhadap ujian punca unit. Keputusan
ini adalah bertentangan dengan ujian punca unit konvensional dengan impak
perubahan struktur adalah diabaikan. Tambahan pula, ujian S-R mempunyai
kuasa yang kecil untuk mengenal pasti persisihan daripada punca unit setelah
perangkuman perubahan struktur.
Kata kunci:
Hipotesis gerakan rawak; perubahan struktur; ujian rentetan pembalikan
REFERENCES
Andrews, D.W.k. 1993. Tests for parameter instability and
structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61: 821-856.
Bachelier, L. 1964. Theory of speculation, in Cootner,
P.(ed), The random character of stock market prices, mIT Press, Cambridge, MA,
1964; Reprint.
Bai, J. & Perron, P. 1998. Estimating and testing linear
models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66: 47-78.
Chaudhuri, K. & Wu, Y. 2003. Random walk versus breaking trend in stock prices: evidence
from emerging markets. Journal of Banking and Finance 27: 575-592.
Cowles, A., & Jones, H. 1937. Some a posteriori
probabilities in stock market action. Econometrica 5: 280-294.
Dickey, D.A. & Fuller, W. 1981. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with
a unit root. Econometrica 49: 1057-1082.
Engle, R.F., Lilien, D.m. & Robins R.P. 1987. Estimating time varying risk premia in the term structure: the
ARCH-Mmodel. Econometrica 55: 391-407.
Fama, E. 1970. Efficient
capital markets: a review of theory an empirical work. Journal of Finance 25:
269-282.
Hansen, B.E. 1995.
Approximate asymptotic p-values for structural change test. Boston College
Working Papers in Economics 297, Boston College
Henry, P.B.
2000. Stock market liberalization, economic reform and
emerging market equity price. Journal of Finance 55: 529-564.
LeRoy, S. 1973. Risk aversion and the
martingale property of stock returns. International Economic Review 14:
436-446.
Lucas, R.,Jr. 1978. Asset prices in an
exchange economy. Econometrica 46: 1429-1446.
Merton, R. 1990. Continuous-Time Finance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge.
Ng, S. & Perron, P. 2001. Lag length selection and the
construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69:
1519-1554.
Perron, P. 1989. The great crush, the oil price shock and the
unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 55: 277-302.
Phillips P.C.B. & Perron, P. 1988. Testing
for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:
335-346.
Rama Cont. 2001. Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized
facts and statistical issues. Quantitative Finance 1: 223-236.
Roberts, H. 1967. Statistical versus
clinical prediction of the stock market, unpublished manuscript. Center for Research in Security Prices, University of Chicago, may.
Samuelson, P. 1965. Proof that properly anticipated prices
fluctuate randomly. Industrial Management Review 6: 41-49.
Schwert, W. 1989. Test
for unit roots: a monte Carlo investigation. Journal
of Business and Economic Statistics 7: 147-159.
Vogelsang T.J. & Perron, P. 1998. Additional tests for a
unit root allowing for a break in the trend function at an unknown time. International
Economic Review 39: 1073-1100.
*Corresponding author; email: wcchin@mmu.edu.my
|