Sains Malaysiana 46(3)(2017): 365–372

http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2017-4603-02

 

The Effects of Disturbance on the Abundance and Foraging Behaviour of Shorebirds and Waterbirds in the Tropical Mudflat Areas

(Kesan Gangguan Terhadap Kelimpahan dan Tabiat Pemakanan Burung Pesisir Pantai

dan Burung Air di Kawasan Berlumpur Tropika)

 

 

ROSLI RAMLI1* & NOR ATIQAH NORAZLIMI1,2

 

1Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory, Malaysia

 

2School of Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology

43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

 

Received: 3 November 2015/Accepted: 9 August 2016

 

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted in the mudflats of Jeram and Remis Beaches, Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia from November 2013 until July 2014 to determine the effects of disturbance on shorebird and waterbird abundance and foraging behavior. Direct observation was used in this study. Mann-Whitney test showed no significant difference in abundance of bird in Jeram and Remis Beaches (t=2.96, p=0.05). A significant difference were detected between the sampling plots in Jeram Beach (S=16.67, p<0.001) and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test shows a significant difference between the sampling plots in Remis Beach (W=78, p=0.003). Spearman’s rank correlation shows significant association between the abundance of bird with the abundance of humans, dogs and vehicles (p<0.05) in both Jeram and Remis Beaches. Humans contribute to a higher percentage in disruptions towards the species studied (47.5%), followed by dogs (32.1%) and vehicles (20.4%). Thirty-six percent of birds stopped feeding and flew away upon disruption, 23% stopped feeding and run away, 22% stopped feeding but stay alert and 19% continue feeding (habituated). Analysis on the responses of birds toward the disturbance show significant difference between species (χ2 = 98.77, p<0.05). This study concluded that anthropogenic disturbance caused a major impact on shorebird and waterbird abundance and influenced their foraging behavior. Response of bird towards disturbance was varied according to the species and types of disturbance. By understanding how the bird species response toward disturbance, the conservation efforts can be implemented more effectively in the future.

 

Keywords: Disturbance; habituation; intertidal mudflats; shorebirds; waterbirds

 

 

ABSTRAK

Suatu kajian telah dijalankan di kawasan berlumpur di Pantai Jeram dan Pantai Remis, Selangor, Semenanjung Malaysia dari November 2013 sehingga Julai 2014 bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti kesan gangguan terhadap kelimpahan dan tabiat pemakanan burung pesisir pantai dan burung air. Teknik pemerhatian secara langsung telah digunakan dalam kajian ini. Ujian ‘Mann-Whitney’ menunjukkan tiada perbezaan ketara dalam kelimpahan burung di Pantai Jeram dan Pantai Remis (t=2.96, p=0.05). Perbezaan ketara telah dikesan di antara plot-plot pensampelan di Pantai Jeram (S=16.67, p<0.001) dan Ujian ‘Wilcoxon Signed Rank’ menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan ketara di antara plot-plot persampelan di Pantai Remis (W=78, p=0.003). Kolerasi ‘Spearman Rank’ menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara kelimpahan burung dengan kelimpahan manusia, anjing dan kenderaan (p<0.05) di Pantai Jeram dan Pantai Remis. Manusia menyumbang kepada peratusan gangguan tertinggi terhadap spesies yang dikaji (47.5%), diikuti oleh anjing (32.1%) dan kenderaan (20.4%). Tiga puluh enam peratus burung berhenti makan dan terbang sejurus gangguan berlaku, 23% berhenti makan dan lari, 22% berhenti makan tetapi berwaspada dan 19% tidak berhenti makan (habituasi). Perbezaan ketara telah ditunjukkan di antara spesies-spesies burung melalui maklum balas ke atas gangguan (χ2 = 98.77, p<0.05). Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahawa kelimpahan dan tabiat pemakanan burung pesisir pantai dan burung air terjejas oleh gangguan antropogenik. Tindak balas burung terhadap gangguan berbeza mengikut spesies dan jenis gangguan. Dengan memahami bagaimana spesies burung bertindak balas terhadap gangguan, usaha pemuliharaan dapat dijalankan dengan lebih berkesan pada masa hadapan.

 

Kata kunci: Burung air; burung pesisir pantai; gangguan; habituasi; lumpur pasang surut

REFERENCES

Barbee, E.A. 1994. Effects of human disturbance on shorebirds populations of Hatteras, Ocracoke, and North Core Banks Islands, North Carolina. MSc. Diss. University of North Carolina (Unpublished).

Beale, C.M. & Monaghan, P. 2005. Modeling the effects of limiting the number of visitors on failure rates of seabird nests. Conservation Biology 19: 2015-2019.

Bellefleur, D., Lee, P. & Ronconi, R.A. 2009. The impact of recreational boat traffic on Marbled Murrelets (Brachyramphus mamoratus). Journal of Environmental Managament  90: 531-538.

Blumstein, D.T., Anthony, L.L., Harcourt, R. & Ross, G. 2003. Testing a key assumption of wildlife buffer zones: Is flight initiation distance a species-specific trait? Biological Conservation 110: 97-100.

Borgmann, K.L. 2011. A Review of Human Disturbance Impacts on Waterbirds. Audubon California. http://www. yourwetlands.org/pdf/A%20Review%20of %20Human%20 Disturbance%20Impacts%20on%20Waterbirds.pdf. Accessed on 29 August 2015.

Burger, J. 1993. Shorebird squeeze. Natural History 102: 8-12.

Burger, J. 1991. Foraging behavior and the effect of human disturbance on the piping plover (Charadrius melodus). Journal of Coastal Research 7: 39-52.

Burger, J. 1989. Least tern populations in coastal New Jersey: Monitoring and management of a regionally-endangered species. Journal of Coastal Research 5: 801-811.

Burger, J. 1981. The effect of human activity on birds at a coastal bay. Biological Conservation 21: 231-241.

Burger, J., Jeitner, C. & Clark, K. 2004. The effect of human activities on migrant shorebirds: Successful adaptive management. Environmental Conservation 31(4): 293-288.

Burger, J. & Gochfeld, M. 1998. Effects of ecotourist on bird behavior at Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Florida. Environmental Conservation 25: 13-21.

Burger, J. & Gochfeld, M. 1991. Human activity influence and diurnal and nocturnal foraging of sanderlings (Calidris alba). The Condor 93: 259-265.

Burton, N.H.K. 2007. Landscape approaches to studying the effects of disturbance on water-birds. The Ibis 149: 95-101

Burton, N.H.K., Rehfisch, M.M. & Clark, N.A. 2002. Impacts of disturbance from construction work on the densities and feeding behaviour of waterbirds using the intertidal mudflats of Cardiff Bay, U.K. Environmental Management 30: 865-871.

Burton, N.H.K., Evans, P.R. & Robinson, M.A. 1996. Effects on shorebirds numbers of disturbance, the loss of a roost site and its replacement by an artificial island at Hartlepool, Cleveland. Biological Conservation 77: 193-201.

Charnov, E.L. 1976. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theory Population Biology 9: 129-136.

Coleman, R.A., Salmon, N.A. & Hawkins, S.J. 2003. Sub-dispersive human disturbance of foraging oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus. Ardea 91(2): 263-268.

Conner, R.N. & Dickson, J.G. 1980. Strip transect sampling and analysis for avian habitat studies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 8: 4-10.

De Boer, W.F. & Longamane, F.A. 1996. The exploitation of intertidal food resources in Inhaca Bay, Mozambique, by shorebirds and humans. Biological Conservation 78: 295- 303.

Durell, S.E.A., Stillman, R.A., Triplet, P., Aulert, C., Biot, D.O.D., Bouchet, A., Duhamel, S., Mayot, S. & Goss-Custard, J.D. 2005. Modelling the efficacy of proposed mitigation areas for shorebirds: A case study on the Seine estuary, France. Biological Conservation 123(1): 67-77.

Dyer, K.R., Christe, M.C. & Wright, E.W. 2000. The classification of mudflats. Continental Shelf Research 20: 1061-1078.

Fitzpatrick, S. & Bouchez, B. 1998. Effects of recreational disturbance on the foraging behaviour of waders on a rocky beach. Bird Study 45: 157-171.

Furness, R.W. 1973. Roost selection by waders. Scottish Birds 7: 281-287.

Gill, J.A., Norris, K. & Sutherland, W.J. 2001. Why behavioural responses may not reflect the population consequences of human disturbance. Biological Conservation 97: 265-268.

Goss-Custard, J.D., Triplet, P. & West, A.D. 2006. Critical thresholds of disturbance by people and raptors in foraging wading birds. Biological Conservation 127(1): 88-97.

Gray, A.C. 2006. Impact of human disturbance on the behavior of sanderlings on the Georgia Cost. MSc. Thesis, Georgia Southern University, USA (Unpublished).

Hill, D., Hockin, D., Price, D., Tucker, G., Morris, R. & Treweek, J. 1997. Bird disturbance: Improving the quality and utility of disturbance research. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 275-288.

Kober, K. 2004. Foraging ecology and habitat use of wading birds and shorebirds in the mangrove ecosystem of the Caéte Bay, Northeast Pará, Brazil. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Bremen, Germany (Unpublished).

Lafferty, K.D. 2001. Birds at a Southern California beach: Seasonality, habitat use and disturbance by human activity. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 1949-1962.

Li, Z.W.D. & Ounsted, R. 2007. The Status of Coastal Waterbirds and Wetlands in Southeast Asia: Results of Waterbirds Surveys in Malaysia (2004-2006) and Thailand and Myanmar (2006). Kuala Lumpur: Wetland International.

Lord, A., Innes, J., Waas, J.R. & Whittingham, M.J. 2001. Effects of human approaches to nests of northern New Zealand dotterels. Biological Conservation 98: 233-240.

McGowan, C.P. & Simons, T.R. 2006. Effects of human recreation on the incubation behavior of American Oystercatchers. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 118: 485-493.

Miller, S.G., Knight, R.L. & Miller, C.K. 2001. Wildlife responses to pedestrians and dogs. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 124-132.

Morton, J.M. 1996. Effects of human disturbance on the behavior and energetics of nonbreeding sanderlings. PhD thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Unpublished).

Nagarajan, R. & Thiyagesan, K. 1996. Waterbirds and substrate quality of the Pichavaram wetlands, Southern India. Ibis 138: 710-721.

Nudds, R.L. & Bryant, D.M. 2000. The energetic cost of short flights in birds. Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 1561- 1572.

Pandiyan, J., Asokan, S. & Nagarajan, R. 2010. Habitat utilization and assemblage patterns of migratory shorebirds at stop-over sites in Southern India. The Stilt 58: 36-44.

Paton, D.C., Ziembicki, M., Owen, P. & Heddle, C. 2000. Disturbance distances for water birds and the management of human recreation with special reference to the Coorong region of South Australia. The Stilt 37: 46.

Platteeuw, M. & Henkens, R.J.H.G. 1997. Possible impacts of disturbance to waterbirds: Individuals, carrying capacity and populations. Wildfowl 48: 225-236.

Polgar, G. 2012. The polychaete reefs of Jeram, Selangor. In Ecology of Klang Strait (2nd ed), Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

Rajpar, M.N. & Zakaria, M. 2010. Density and diversity of water birds and terrestrial birds at Paya Indah Wetland Reserve, Selangor Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Biological Sciences 10(7): 658-666.

Rodgers, J.A. & Schwikert, S.T. 2002. Buffer-zone distances to protect foraging and loafing waterbirds from disturbances by personal watercraft and outboard-powered boats. Conservation Biology 16: 216-224.

Rodgers, J.A. & Schwikert, S.T. 2003. Buffer zone distances to protect foraging and loafing waterbirds from disturbance by airboats in Florida. Waterbirds 26: 437-443.

Schluter, D. & Ricklefs, R.E. 1993. Species diversity and productivity related? In Species Diversity in Ecological Communities, edited by Ricklefs, R.E. & Schluter, D. London: University of Chicago Press.

Smit, C.J. & Visser, G.J.M. 1993. Effects of disturbance on shorebirds: A summary of existing knowledge from the Dutch Wadden Sea and Delta area. Wader Study Group Bulletin 68: 6-19.

Smithsonian Institution. 2010. Tidal Flat Habitats. www.sms. si.edu/IRLSpec/Tidal_Flats.htm. Accessed on 21 November 2014.

Spencer, J. 2010. Migratory shorebird ecology in the Hunter Estuary, South-Eastern Australia. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Ph.D thesis. Australian Catholic University (Unpublished).

StatSoft Inc. 2007. STATISTICA (data analysis software system). Version 8.0. Oklahoma (USA): www.statsoft.com.

Stillman, R. & Goss-Custard, J.D. 2002. Seasonal changes in the response of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus to human disturbance. Journal of Avian Biology 33: 358-365.

Thomas, K., Kvitek, R.G. & Bretz, C. 2003. Effects of human activity on the foraging behavior of sanderlings Calidris alba. Biological Conservation 109: 67-71.

Trulio, L.A. & Sokale, J. 2008. Foraging shorebird response to trail use around San Francisco Bay. Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 1775-1780.

University of Sydney. 2010. Using Remote Sensing to Obtain Information about Mudflats. Sydney.edu.au/science/bio/eidd/ research/ecology/new_methods/remote_sensing_mudflats. html. Accessed 26 November 2014.

 

 

*Corresponding author; email: rosliramli@um.edu.my

 

 

 

previous