Sains Malaysiana
50(11)(2021): 3219-3229
http://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2021-5011-06
Enhanced Drought
Tolerance of Arabica Coffee (Coffea
arabica L.) by Grafting Method
(Peningkatan Toleransi Kemarau Kopi Arabica (Coffea arabica L.) melalui Kaedah Cantuman)
NGOC-THANG
VU1, JONG-MAN PARK2, NGOC-QUAT NGUYEN3,
TRONG-TRUONG-SON NGUYEN4, IL-SOEP KIM 2& DONG-CHEOL
JANG2*
1Faculty of
Agronomy, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam
2Department of
Horticulture, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea
3Field Crops
Research Institute, Hai Duong, Vietnam
4Hanoi
University of Natural Resource and Environment, Hanoi, Vietnam
Received:
1 May 2020/Accepted: 16 March 2021
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to evaluate grafting method to
improve the drought tolerance of Coffea arabica. Using C. arabica species as scions, and C. robusta as rootstock, the grafted plant was compared with the non-grafted
plant (C. arabica) under water
deficit condition. The result shown that growth parameters such as plant
height, leaf length, and leaf width of the grafted coffee plants were higher
than those of the non-grafted. The leaf area, fresh and dry weight of plants
were highly reduced in non-grafted coffee plants. The leaf chlorophyll content
(SPAD) and chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) values of the grafted and
non-grafted coffee plants decreased significantly with increasing duration
under water deficit condition. The SPAD and Fv/Fm values of the two coffee
types were also increased significantly with increasing duration after
re-watering. Compared to the non-grafted plants, higher values of SPAD, Fv/Fm
and relative water content in the leaf were observed in the grafted coffee
plants. Moreover, lower values of relative ion leakage were observed in the
grafted coffee plants after three days of water withholding and one month after
re-watering. On the other hand, the grafted coffee plants showed enhanced
drought tolerance by reducing the percentages of wilting plant under water
deficit condition, and increasing the recovery percentages after re-watering.
Keywords: Coffee;
drought tolerance; grafting; growth; physiology
ABSTRAK
Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk menilai kaedah cantuman untuk meningkatkan
toleransi kemarau Coffea arabica. Dengan menggunakan spesies C. arabica sebagai skion dan C. robusta sebagai stok akar, tanaman yang dicantumkan
dibandingkan dengan tanaman yang tidak dicantumkan (C. arabica) dalam keadaan kekurangan air. Hasil kajian
menunjukkan bahawa parameter pertumbuhan seperti tinggi tanaman, panjang daun
dan lebar daun tanaman kopi yang dicantumkan lebih tinggi berbanding tanaman
kopi yang tidak dicantumkan. Luas daun, berat tanaman segar dan kering sangat
berkurang pada tanaman kopi yang tidak dicantumkan. Nilai kandungan klorofil
daun (SPAD) dan pendarfluor klorofil (Fv/Fm) tanaman kopi yang dicantum dan
tidak dicantumkan menurun dengan ketara dengan peningkatan tempoh dalam keadaan
kekurangan air. Nilai SPAD dan Fv/Fm daripada kedua-dua jenis kopi juga
meningkat dengan ketara selari dengan peningkatan tempoh selepas penyiraman
semula. Berbanding dengan tanaman yang tidak dicantumkan, nilai SPAD, Fv/Fm dan
kandungan air relatif dalam daun dilihat lebih tinggi pada tanaman kopi yang
dicantumkan. Tambahan pula, nilai kebocoran ion relatif yang lebih rendah
diperhatikan pada tanaman kopi yang dicantumkan setelah tiga hari tidak disiram
dan satu bulan setelah penyiraman semula. Sebaliknya, tanaman kopi yang
dicantumkan menunjukkan peningkatan toleransi kekeringan dengan mengurangkan
peratusan tanaman layu dalam keadaan kekurangan air dan meningkatkan peratusan
pemulihan setelah penyiraman semula.
Kata kunci: Cantuman;
fisiologi; kunci; pertumbuhan; toleransi kemarau
REFERENCES
Barros,
R.S., Mota, J.W.S., DaMatta, F.M. & Maestri, M. 1997. Decline of vegetative
growth in Coffea arabica L. in
relation to leaf temperature, water potential and stomatal conductance. Field Crops Research 54(1): 65-72.
Carr, M.K.V. 2001. The water relations and
irrigation requirements of coffee. Experimental
Agriculture 37(1): 1-36.
Cheserek, J.J.
& Gichimu, B.M. 2012. Drought and heat tolerance in coffee: A review. International Research Journal of
Agricultural Science and Soil Science 2(12): 498-501.
DaMatta, F.M.
2004. Exploring drought tolerance in coffee: A physiological approach with some
insights for plant breeding. Brazilian
Journal of Plant Physiology 16(1): 1-6.
DaMatta, F.M.
& Ramalho, J.D.C. 2006. Impacts of drought and temperature stress on coffee
physiology and production: A review. Brazilian
Journal of Plant Physiology 18(1): 55-81.
DaMatta, F.M.,
Chaves, A.R.M., Pinheiro, H.A., Ducatti, C. & Loureiro, M.E. 2003. Drought
tolerance of two field-grown clones of Coffea
canephora. Plant Science 164(1):
111-117.
DaMatta, F.M.,
Maestri, M., Barros, R.S. & Regazzi, A.J. 1993. Water relations of coffee
leaves (C. arabica and C. canephora) in response to drought. Journal of Horticultural Science 68(5):
741-746.
Dias, P.C.,
Araujo, W.L., Moraes, G.A.B.K., Barros, R.S. & DaMatta, F.M. 2007.
Morphological and physiological responses of two coffee progenies to soil water
availability. Journal of Plant
Physiology 164(12): 1639-1647.
D' Souza, G.F.,
Renukaswamy, N.S., Anand, C.G., Awati, M.G. & Lamani, B. 2009. Biochemical
and physiological changes in two Arabica coffee genotypes in relation to
drought tolerance. Journal of Coffee
Research 37: 26-42.
Fahl, J.I., Carelli, M.L.C., Menezes, H.C.,
Gallo, P.B. & Trevelin, P.C.O. 2001. Gas exchange, growth, yield and
beverage quality of Coffea arabica cultivars grafted on to C. canephora and C. congensis. Experimental Agriculture 37(2): 241-252.
Hoagland, D.R.
& Arnon, D.I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without
soil. California Agricultural Experiment
Station Circular 347: 1-32.
Kumar, A.,
Ramamurthy, N., Muralidhara, H.R. & Srinivasan, C.S. 2003.
Interspecific grafting and its influence on yield, bean quality,
caffeine content and nutrients uptake of arabica scion cultivars. Journal of Coffee Research 31(1): 76-94.
Lee, J.M. &
Oda, M. 2003. Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Horticultural Reviews 28: 61-124.
Lee, J.M.,
Kubota, C., Tsao, S.J., Bie, Z., Hoyos Echevarria, P., Morra, L. & Oda, M.
2010. Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques,
automation. Scientia Horticulturae 127(2): 93-105.
Nanda, A.K. &
Melnyk, C.W. 2018. The role of plant hormones during grafting. Journal of Plant Research 131(1): 49-58.
Novaes, P., Souza,
J.P. & Prado, C.H.B.A. 2011. Grafting for improving net photosynthesis of Coffee arabica in field in southeast of
Brazil. Expl. Agric. 47(1): 53-68.
Patil, S.,
D’Souza, G.F., Umesh, D.K. & Rudragouda, C. 2019. Rootstock scion
interaction effects on biochemical and gas exchange drought tolerant traits in
arabica (Coffea arabica L.) coffee. Plant Physiology Reports 24(3): 316-327.
Pinheiro, H.A.,
DaMatta, F.M., Chaves, A.R.M., Loureiro, M.E. & Ducatti, C. 2005. Drought
tolerance is associated with rooting depth and stomatal control of water use in
clones of Coffea canephora. Annals of Botany 96(1): 101-108.
Rivero, R.M.,
Ruiz, J.M. & Romero, L. 2003. Role of grafting in horticultural plants
under stress conditions. Food,
Agriculture & Environment 1(1): 70-74.
Tesfaye, S.G.,
Ismail, M.R., Ramlan, M.F., Marziah, M. & Kausar, H. 2014. Effect of soil
drying on rate of stress development, leaf gas exchange and proline
accumulation in robusta coffee (Coffea
canephora pierre ex froehner) clones. Experimental Agriculture 50(3): 458-479.
Worku, M. &
Astatkie, T. 2010. Dry matter partitioning and physiological responses of Coffea arabica varieties to soil
moisture deficit stress at the seedling stage in Southwest Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5(15): 2066-2072.
Zhang, X.B., Lei, L., Lai, J.S., Zhao, H.M. &
Song, W.B. 2018. Effects of drought stress and water recovery on physiological
responses and gene expression in maize seedlings. BMC Plant Biology 18(68): 1-16.
Zhao, M.G., Zhao,
X., Wu, Y.X. & Zhang, L.X. 2007. Enhanced sensitivity to oxidative stress
in an Arabidopsis nitric oxide
synthase mutant. Journal of Plant
Physiology 164(6): 737-745.
*Corresponding
author; email: jdc@kangwon.ac.kr
|