Sains Malaysiana 44(3)(2015): 421–427
Investigation
of Three Pre-treatment Methods Prior to Nanofiltration Membrane for Palm Oil Mill Effluent Treatment
(Kajian Tiga Kaedah Pra-Rawat Sebelum Membran Penurasan Nano untuk Rawatan Efluen Kilang Minyak Sawit)
MUHAMMAD SAID1, ABDUL WAHAB MOHAMMAD2*, MOHD TUSIRIN MOHD NOR2,
SITI ROZAIMAH SHEIKH ABDULLAH2 & HASSIMI ABU HASAN2
1Department of
Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, University of Sriwijaya
Palembang 30662, Indonesia
2Department of Chemical
and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment
Univesiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Received: 8 January 2014/Accepted: 3 September 2014
ABSTRACT
Palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment has developed in the last
decade. Due to the characteristic and volume of POME, it needed a
complete treatment to reduce the pollutant content. Three pre-treatments
method, ultrafiltration, adsorption and decantation were applied prior to nanofiltration (NF) membrane. The polyethersulphone membrane, montmorillonite as the adsorbent and modern
decanter was investigated in this research. Two types of NF membrane, named NF-1
and NF-ASP30
were used after pre-treatment. The removal of four important parameters were
determined i.e. COD, TSS, colour and
turbidity. The results showed that the adsorption and UF is better than
decantation pre-treatment. The ultrafiltration and adsorption can reduce POME content
more than 80% for all parameter while decantation varied between 40 and 80%.
The combination of ultrafiltration and adsorption with both of NF membrane can removed
almost all the parameter. But the decantation can only remove the turbidity but
not for the rest of the parameters. Besides the POME content, the flux
decline for both of NF membrane was also investigated. The flux of NF-1
membrane was higher than NF-ASP30 membrane but NF-ASP was more relative
stable for the flux decline. Overall, NF-1 has better performance in flux decline.
Keywords: Adsorption; decantation; nanofiltration; POME;
ultrafiltration
ABSTRAK
Rawatan efluen kilang minyak sawit (POME) telah dibangunkan sejak sedekad yang lalu. Disebabkan ciri dan isi padu POME, ia memerlukan satu rawatan yang sempurna untuk mengurangkan kandungan pencemaran. Tiga kaedah pra-rawat iaitu penurasan ultra, penjerapan dan penyiringan telah digunakan sebelum menggunakan membran penurasan nano. Dalam penyelidikan ini, membran polietersulfon, bahan penjerap iaitu montmorilonit dan penyiring moden telah dikaji. Dua jenis membran penurasan nano iaitu NF-1 dan NF-ASP30 telah digunakan selepas kaedah pra-rawat. Penyingkiran empat jenis parameter yang penting, iaitu keperluan oksigen kimia (COD), jumlah pepejal terampai (TSS), warna dan kekeruhan telah ditentukan. Keputusan menunjukkan bahawa penjerapan dan penurasan ultra lebih baik daripada pra-rawat penyiringsan penurasan ultra dan penjerapam boleh mengurangkan kandungan POME lebih daripada 80% untuk semua parameter manakala penyiringan berubah antara 40 dan 80%. Gabungan penurasan ultra dan penjerapan dengan kedua-dua membran penurasan nano boleh menyingkirkan hampir kesemua parameter, manakala penyiringan hanya boleh menyingkirkan kekeruhan tetapi bukan untuk parameter yang selebihnya. Selain kandungan POME, penurunan fluks untuk kedua-dua membran NF juga dikaji. Fluks membran NF-1 adalah lebih tinggi daripada membran NF-ASP30 tetapi penurunan fluks NF-ASP30 adalah lebih stabil. Secara keseluruhannya, NF-1 mempunyai prestasi yang lebih baik dalam penurunan fluks.
Kata kunci: Penjerapan; penurasan nano; penurasan ultra; penyiringan; POME
REFERENCES
Abuhabib, A.A., Mohammad, A.W., Rahman, R.A. & Shafie, A.H. 2012. Nanofiltration membrane modification by UV graftng for
salt rejection and fouling resistance improvement for brackish water
desalination. Desalination 295: 16-25.
Ahmad, A.L., Bhatia, S., Ibrahim, N. & Sumathi, S. 2005. Adsorption of residual
oil from palm oil mill effluent using rubber powder. Brazilian
Journal of Chemical Engineering 22: 371-379.
Ahmad, A.L., Bhatia, S. & Ismail, S. 2003. Water recycling from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using membrane
technology. Desalination 157: 87-95.
Ahmad, A.L., Sumathi, S. &
Hameed, B.H. 2006. Coagulation of residue oil and suspended
solid in palm oil mill effluent by chitosan, alum and PAC. Chemical
Engineering Journal 118: 99-105.
Ahmaruzzaman,
M. 2008. Adsorption of phenolic compounds on low-cost adsorbents: A review. Advances
in Colloid and Interface Science 143: 48-67.
Ahmed, S., Rasul, M.G., Hasib, M.A. & Watanabe, Y. 2010. Performance of nanofiltration membrane in a vibrating module (VSEP-NF) for
arsenic removal. Desalination 252: 127-134.
Amin, I.N.H., Mohammad, A.W., Markom, M., Leo, C.P. & Hilal,
N. 2010. Flux decline study in UF of
glycerin-rich fatty acid solutions. Journal of Membrane Science 351(1-2):
75-86.
Borja, R. & Banks, C.J. 1995. Comparison of an anaerobic
filter and an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor treating palm oil mill effluent. Process
Biochemistry 30: 511-521.
Borja, R., Banks, C.J. & Sanchez,
E. 1996. Anaerobic treatment
of palm oil mill effluent in a two-stage up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket
(UASB) system. Journal of Biotechnology 45(2): 125-135.
Chan, Y.J., Chong, M.F. & Law, C.L. 2010. Biological
treatment of anaerobically digested palm oil mill effluent (POME) using a
lab-scale sequencing batch reactor (SBR). Journal of Environmental
Management 91: 1738-1746.
Gönder, B.Z., Arayici, S. & Barlas, H. 2011. Advanced treatment of pulp and paper mill
wastewater by nanofiltration process: Effects of
operating conditions on membrane fouling. Separation and Purification
Technology 76(3): 292-302.
Hameed, B.H., Ahmad, A.L. & Hoon,
N.A. 2003. Removal of residual oil from palm oil mill
effluent using solvent extraction method. Jurnal Teknologi38: 33-42.
Najafpour, G., Yieng,
H.A., Younesi, H. & Zinatizadeh,
A.A. 2005. Effect of organic
loading on performance of rotating biological contactors using palm oil mill
effluents. Process Biochemistry 40: 2879-2884.
Ng, W.J., Goh, A.C.C. & Tay, J.H. 1988. Palm oil
mill effluent treatment-liquid-solid separation with dissolved air flotation. Biological
Wastes 25: 257-268.
Said, M., Mohammad, A.W., Nor, M.T.M., Abdullah, S.R.S.
& Hasan, H.A. 2014. Chemical cleaning of fouled polyethersulphone membranes during ultrafiltration of palm oil mill effluent. Membrane Water
Treatment 5(3): 207-219.
Susanto, H. 2011. Towards practical
implementations of membrane distillation. Chemical Engineering and
Processing: Process Intensification 50(2): 139-150.
Vijayaraghavan, K., Ahmad, D. & Aziz, M.E.A. 2007. Aerobic
treatment of palm oil mill effluent. Journal of Environmental
Management 82: 24-31.
Wei, X., Wang, Z., Fan, F., Wang, J. & Wang, S. 2010.
Advanced treatment of a complex pharmaceutical wastewater by nanofiltration: Membrane foulant identification and cleaning. Desalination 251: 167-175.
Wah, W.P., Sulaiman, N.M., Nachiappan, M. & Varadaraj,
B. 2002. Pre-treatment and membrane UF using treated palm oil mill effluent
(POME). Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 24:
891-898.
Wu, T.Y., Mohammad, A.W., Jahim,
J.M. & Anuar, N. 2007. Palm oil mill effluent
(POME) treatment and bioresources recovery using UF
membrane: Effect of pressure on membrane fouling. Biochemical Engineering
Journal 35(3): 309-317.
Yejian, Z., Li, Y., Xiangli,
Q., Lina, C., Xiangjun, N., Zhijian,
M. & Zhenjia, Z. 2008. Integration of biological method and
membrane technology in treating palm oil mill effluent. Journal of
Environmental Sciences 20: 558-564.
Zinatizadeh, A.A., Mohamed, A.R., Mashitah,
M.D., Abdullah, A.Z. & Najafpour, G.D. 2006.
Pretreated POME digestion in an up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed film bioreactor:
A comparative study. IJE Transactions B: Applications 19: 1-9.
*Corresponding
author; email: wahabm@eng.ukm.my
|